Campus in lock down because of sightings of a gunman. It's pretty eerie, it's the middle of the day, the sky's swarming with helicopters, and not a soul in sight.
'Gunman', as used by the media in this and many cases, is such a weird word in that context; it turns the simply descriptive 'man with a gun' into a unique identity value.
It's an interesting use of language. It objectifies the person, an obviously troubled human being who has come to dire straits and irrational behavior, into the single value of: "He/she Who Has Gun".
This is, I suppose, necessary in warfare. The "Enemy" isn't an individual, with hopes, dreams, family, culture... they're reduced to a single value, which allows us to dispense with them with some degree of impartiality.
But a random man on campus who happens to have a gun? Disarm him, is he still, THE Gunman? Is he now "The Suspect" or "Intruder"? At one point is he just one of us again, if ever?
I know it's simply descriptive, but the psychology of these sorts of words is interesting (and often, disturbing) to me. It's a casual use, and I'm certainly not chastising you for it - just some random thoughts. ;)
no subject
Date: 2009-07-24 06:32 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-07-24 07:33 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-07-24 07:14 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-07-24 07:33 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-07-24 07:43 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-07-24 08:00 pm (UTC)It's an interesting use of language. It objectifies the person, an obviously troubled human being who has come to dire straits and irrational behavior, into the single value of: "He/she Who Has Gun".
This is, I suppose, necessary in warfare. The "Enemy" isn't an individual, with hopes, dreams, family, culture... they're reduced to a single value, which allows us to dispense with them with some degree of impartiality.
But a random man on campus who happens to have a gun? Disarm him, is he still, THE Gunman? Is he now "The Suspect" or "Intruder"? At one point is he just one of us again, if ever?
I know it's simply descriptive, but the psychology of these sorts of words is interesting (and often, disturbing) to me. It's a casual use, and I'm certainly not chastising you for it - just some random thoughts. ;)